 |
!-Comment-! - Interesting how once more the excuse of lack of R&D funding is given in answering questions of this type. It probably is true - the Shuttle is a prime example of how public gaze is re-directed from the hidden, compartmentalised projects that have grown in the post-Roswell era.
STRASBOURG, France - The United States is not developing space weapons and could not afford to do so even if it wanted to, an official with the Pentagon's National Security Space Office said Thursday.
Pete Hays, a senior policy analyst at the space office who is also
associate director of the Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies, said U.S. policy on space weaponry has remained pretty much the same over the last 30 years despite the occasionally heated debate on the subject during the administration of former U.S. President George W. Bush.
|
"There has not been one minute spent on this issue as far as I know,"
Hays said of U.S. Defense Department policy on using weapons in space.
"There are no space weaponization programs. It's an issue that
academics like to flog now and then, but in terms of funded programs,
there aren't any. I can tell you that categorically."
Hays made his remarks during a space security conference organized by
the International Space University here. He said that even if the
United States decided to embark on a space-based weapon system, it
could not pay for it given its current military program commitments.
Hays said the U.S. policy of refusing to sign a treaty banning space-
based weapons has not changed since the 1970s. Despite occasional
efforts, no administration, Democrat or Republican, has been able to
craft an acceptable treaty.
Hays said he cannot explain why a policy statement from the new
administration of President Barack Obama appears to highlight a
priority of seeking a worldwide ban on weapons that would interfere
with satellites. "This will be an extremely difficult policy to adopt"
for the same reasons that other administrations have fallen short,
Hays said. "It is not for lack of trying that the United States and
others have been unable" to produce a treaty.
Russia and China continue to try to win support for such a treaty at
the United Nations Disarmament Conference.
In a separate presentation to the conference, John Sheldon of the
School of Advanced Air and Space Studies at Maxwell Air Force Base,
Ala., said defining space weapons will never be possible to the extent
demanded by a treaty.
"Four guys in black pajamas who attack a satellite control station:
That too is a space weapon, and you cannot stop it," Sheldon said.
http://www.space.com/news/090220-pentagon-space-weapons.html
» 1 Comment
1Comment at Monday, 16 March 2009 17:20
I think there is a LOT more going on above our heads than we're told about. Every night you can see objects that are not stars glinting in the atmosphere.
» Post Comment Exopolitics UK site guests need to enter the anti-spam code.
Only registered users can write a comment. Please login or register.
|