This is an article by prolific exopolitics author Ed Komarek. It covers discussion of a space naval fleet which was possible discovered by British hack-tivist Gary McKinnon when he penetrated military computer networks with relative ease in the era immediately around the groundbreaking Disclosure Project. You can find significant media and articles on Gary's story on this site. In addition this whole area is to be the focus of a presentation at Leeds Annual Exopolitics Conference in August 2010. A compilation of Ed's earlier articles is available for download in our resources section. Sign-up for full access. Some important information has surfaced recently into the public domain on the Navy's Tenth Fleet http://www.fcc.navy.mil/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Tenth_Fleet , thanks to Admiral Roughead, the Military UFO Working Group, Source A and the Pickering brothers. This first surfaced on the Open Minds Forum creating quite a buzz. Please notice in this entry that the Tenth Fleet has been recently reactivated and that, "Tenth Fleet has operational control over Navy information, computer, cryptologic, and space forces."

I suspect that the rumored secret space fleet, code named Solar Warden, rumored to be under the operational control of the Navy, is part of the Tenth Fleet.

http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/2009/05/solar-warden-articles.html

This is very important confirmation for the existence of the secret space fleet and for the Navy's operational control over the secret space fleet. This information comes from none other than Admiral Roughead through Source A and the Pickering brothers.

I checked in with Clay and Shawn Pickering and they responded telling me that what I needed to know is as follows taken from a post to OM.

"Dear OMF, We promised that we would release what we know about the Adm. Roughead speech. We will do so, but under constraints. The absolute transparency is not forthcoming. There are reasons for this. Mainly, National Security Constraints. We must be circumspect. A little inferential work must take place on OMF's side.

We are reposting Source A's notes on the NYAC Meeting. Here it is: "If you remember, I said it was OK to mention the place." Our source did in fact say this as I had mentioned before. I want to be clear on this. However, as I pointed out to our source, Shawn and I did not want at this time to drop where the event happened until we had the chance to talk it over. We have yet to do this face to face.

*Yes, it was a Navy League Sponsored event at the New York Athletic Club. *Space was limited and names had to be submitted to be vetted. *Yes, it's on the NY Navy League web site, it has been advertised since March, there is nothing strange about this.*Events involving "Senior Military Personnel" are planned out in advanced. Now the question is, as a so-called "Public Event", who in the public will go????? *There was no advertisement of the event in the main stream media. *There was...NO PRESS ALLOWED AT ALL !!!!

Let me clarify this. There was only one vetted military official who was taking pictures during this time. This gentleman was a professional photographer by what I can tell. The photographer had a Navy strap which held the camera around his neck. He had a reason to be there. *The title of the talk was advertised as the same for the other three events, but only Military, Navy Leaguers, UN and State Dept. were at this one !!

*According to our source, he DID NOT GIVE THE SAME SPEECH at the other events. The title was the same, but he left out MUCH detail at the other events such as the information about the formation of the 10th fleet and it's size, funding, structure, purpose, etc. *Security was not an issue at the other events.... Now why do you think this was so?

"I say again, no one was getting into this event without prior authorization. For example, if someone from the "Public" wanted to attend and sent in their check for $60.00 as a "Non Navy League Member" the check would have been returned with a statement that the event is full."

"Remember, sometimes keeping things secret means putting it right under people's noses without calling it "SECRET"." *Admiral Roughead is also a member of the New York Yacht Club and his dinner with them was for "Members Only". Again, NO PRESS and no chance that other Military people could attend.Addendum: This does not include Admiral Roughead's military staff. Also, this is dependent on our source's contacts about who attended the other events. Also, there were no "Vetting" or security issues with his talk at NYPI and NYU... Now why do you think THAT was so ?

"The purpose of having Clay attend this event was to introduce him to people of importance with regards to Source A and have Clay see first hand how connected Source A really is and not just another Naval Officer." by Source A. All the Best,
---------------------------
We met our source along with another confidant (who shall remained un-named) for dinner in Downtown New York last night (04/12/2010) at 5:00PM EST. Many topics were discussed with regards to disclosure and contact. Obviously, the most important topic we hashed over was Chief of Naval Operations/Admiral Roughead's lecture and what it entailed. We will give a basic summary of what we think is the most important element of Admiral Roughead's speech which concerns the 10th Fleet.

Summary Analysis: Now, We must keep some things in mind and keep in context the significance of this meeting, who was there, and the nature of this "public" event:1) Clay met Source A's UN counterpart (This is the third). He also met the previous counterpart. This is the "other" of which we spoke earlier in the thread. Yes, this "other" counterpart was the second to our source as a UN "working group" representative. This second counterpart did not serve the billet of three years which is demanded for this posting.

There are reasons why this counterpart served only a short period; it is why our source did not know who this person was until recently. We cannot get into this for the sake of security. This is a continuity observation that needs to be NOTED!! 2) We mentioned Adm. Roughead's speech on the creation of the 10th Fleet:14,000 individuals, working out of Ft. Meade. Clay heard an additional 40,000 plus individuals will be used for INFORMATION AND CONTROL. What are these people going to do with this funding (NOT BY CONGRESS)?

More than likely, this additional 40,000 plus will be ran out of Fort Mead.3) Remember, Source A stated 2 years ago that the mission of this program is to create the environment whereby Disclosure can happen? That means, the environment must be friendly enough that DISCUSSIONS need to take place!!

Now, let us take a moment and go forward. Source A and Clay were walking to Shawn's place of business to have a drink after the NYAC event. Source A gets a phone call while en-route. It went something like this: Source A: Yes? Oh, hi Admiral. How did it go? It was okay, but it could have gone better. The questions were censored.

Okay. Now, questions at the NYAC were written down on cards for Admiral Roughead to answer. No names were listed on the cards. The cards were handed to an individual. That individual was suppose to read them to Admiral Roughead. That did not happen. In fact, the individual who fielded the questions did not bother, purposely, to retrieve our source's card[S] prior to the beginning of the questions. Source had to physically get up and put the cards in his hand! The individual was careful to keep source's cards out of the mix of the other cards that were submitted.

Both Source and I witnessed this. The questions the Admiral got were read from a separate piece of paper, exclusive of the cards. So what? This is what is interesting: 23 individuals out of 130 submitted Disclosure "Friendly" Questions. These questions were never read. How do we know? Someone had to have looked at the cards prior to giving them to the one who screens. Hmm? I wonder who that was?

Addendum: Clay's question was this: Admiral Roughead, Will the Navy admit to the "Boys topside" with regards to Disclosure? What will be the Navy's policy with disclosure." Clay handed his card to Source and what Clay found out later is that Source crossed out "Boys topside" and inserted UFO phenomena. Source later told Clay to not be cryptic and be direct with questions. Source said that through experience when a lecturer gets a question which might not be understood it will be discarded. Again, be direct.

Think about the cards that were collected, yet never read. Why? Isn't Admiral Roughead an eager beaver for Disclosure? Does he know? Does he have filters around him? He mentioned the 40,000 plus personnel for the information and control aspect of the 10th fleet. What gives? Can he say???? Does he want to know the specifics????????? Is there plausible denial in his "Ignorance?"Remember folks:

That middle level bureaucratic tier must be informed and put in place so that Disclosure and Contact can happen. Where are they going to get these resources? How are they going to be put in place? AN ASIDE: This is a process. Everything takes time!! Discussions must take place somewhere. The feedback must take place somewhere!

Oh! Adm. Roughhead is speaking at the NYAC... How interesting.Remember: The environment for discussions of disclosure must be friendly and productive enough to create an environment for Disclosure to possibly happen. This is NOT a point to be overlook, skipped or rushed."

The Navy's Tenth Fleet
By Ed Komarek
3/20/10
Copy and Distribute Freely
My blog: http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/