!-Comment-! UN Meetings - the disclosure feedback loop and Jungian reality amplification  Michael Salla from the Exopolitics Institute has released a follow-up alert to the previous article which gave details of a secret United Nations meeting related to not only the disclosure of Extra-Terrestrial intelligence but, more importantly, the idea that first mass-contact with ETI must, as we have pointed out before on this site, involve a feedback-loop with terrestrial citizens to give 'permission'. This idea brings forth issues which are at the core of what liaison with higher intelligence agents is about and relates to a discussion that author and radio host Whitley Strieber had centred around his article 'Elephant in the Room'. Whilst talking to Paola Harris recently - Whitley discussed the idea that disclosure is possibly a

gateway for alien intelligences. Essentially we can bring in one of the most valid lenses through which exopolitical theories can be viewed - the Jungian idea of a collective realm of shared experience. In addition it's worth introducing the work of Rupert Sheldrake and his morphic fields as his work feeds off the basic systems Jung used.

Essentially we can suggest that an implicit feedback loop between terrestrial and extra-terrestrial/dimensional entities exists and has always done so throughout human evolution. Integrated into this model at various levels is the idea of a planetary intelligence or Gaian over-mind. The reason we are stuck at the point of mostly seeing the 'saucer' as a pin-point light in the sky is because the Western mind-set has failed to integrate the idea of life outside the geostation as it has done with so many other crucial issues in life. Whilst we sit in an entrenched collective denial - we're not amplifying or opening the informational loop between 'self' and 'Other' - even when the human race found nuclear weapons and the presence on the planet of UFOs radically increased, the various national security states went into over-drive and instead of liaison with these entities the public got denial and ridicule from an infiltrated media and global intelligence services. 

Strieber makes a good observation in relation to this model by suggesting that what are commonly known as 'abductions' are in fact literal and metaphorical "rips" or bursts in this process because the situation necessitated such an approach. In other words such events are a kind of representation of the desperate nature of things - we have 60 years of publicised lights-in-the-sky due to a failure to adapt and evolve in response to H.I.A. signals and conversely, pockets of drama in the collective psyche in the form of seemingly a form of contact without consent. At a raw, individual level could this process even manifest in the rare cases of human abduction that are invasive and violent in nature? By [re]integrating the collective, spiritual over-mind in a manner similar to the nomadic, partnership societies of pre 12000 BC era, can we once more find equal communication between self and higher cosmic orders?

Again this is just a model but seems to me to be one of the more accurate and useful ones to use. However we have the amazing happenings in Mexico over the last decade to back-up our ideas here. Mexico is one country where the alien and UFO presence has penetrated mainstream reality. Here we have a population that have missed the usual propaganda and instead all watch the skies and nightly news for video footage of their interactions with UFOs. Some of this has to be seen to be believed. 

So as suggested -  it could well be that the most important part of this alledged United Nations meeting is their point that first contact is based on a large degree of consensus. The problem is that we've undergone huge degrees of misinformation and fear-based information release in the post-war period. Most people have 'Independence Day'  scenarios in their minds - a product of feudal, male-dominator culture when instead it's more likely that some sort of galactic protocol exists where higher intelligence agents and their various federations have to be invited into the gravity wells of developing planets and societies. The gateway or portal idea discussed by Strieber and Harris makes sense because it represents a kind of disclosure bifurcation point -  one that could well signal a fundamental and permanent shift in consciousness as we then are forced to integrate new knowledge and new ways of 'being' and an evolving race who are now in real communication with other civilisations.

Exopolitics is the only area preparing us for such a phase-shift and as such it's crucial that the wider institutions of government and education begin working with the field to make this change occur in a manner that won't be hijacked by above-government groups, religious zealots or greedy trans-national corporations. The communication issue is at the heart of first contact scenarios - you only have to examine 20th century first contacts between Western anthropology and say Amazonian tribes to see that although we share some common facets, realities can also 'clash' and cause misunderstanding and fear. Dr Michael Salla highlights the use of 'citizen diplomacy' for contact between ET groups and humans. Whilst individual contacts may create a direct link of shared meaning, more structured diplomacy events may well lead to further problems as it can be suggested that 'diplomacy' as we understand it often relies on a system of scheming or deception as both parties aim to maximise their own desired outcomes.

The audio interview called "European UFOs" between Paola Harris and Whitley Strieber where these issues are touched upon can be found here: http://www.unknowncountry.com

A local copy is streamed below. This is a subscriber interview and you should support Dreamland and other radio shows who work hard to deal with these issues. 

Dreamland Radio -  Whitley Strieber and Paola Harris - December 2007 

A stunning presentation demonstrating what we've referred to here as the ETI feedback loop is available to watch in conjunction with an article: Bursting the Psy-Op Bubble with Mass Interaction

-- 

David Griffin, Exopolitics UK

23/2/2008 

--

Updated Release on UN Meeting Follows..... 

Confirmation & Update on Secret United Nations Meeting Discussing UFOs & Extraterrestrial Life

I recently circulated an article describing a secret meeting that allegedly occurred at the New York office of the United Nations discussing UFOs/extraterrestrial life. The confidential source (A) for the meeting is presently working as a member of the diplomatic community who relayed this information to two New York based researchers, Shawn and Clay Pickering. I am pleased to announce that I have received independent confirmation that the alleged meeting did occur on the morning of February 12, 2008 as Clay's and Shawn's source claimed. I was also given information by an independent source (B), who I believe is very reliable, on what transpired at the meeting. It was claimed that a document had been circulated at the meeting, and was now being relayed to key ministries of many nations for further study and comments.

I have yet to witness the document which allegedly refers to an offer by extraterrestrials to help prepare humanity for the disclosure of extraterrestrial life. The meeting also apparently discussed how the UN was being encouraged to take a proactive stand on the release of secret technologies that will enable the development of free energy. The date 2013 was given as the time when extraterrestrials would unambiguously appear. This was consistent with the date given in my earlier article. I will share more information on the alleged document circulated at the UN meeting and the independent source (B) confirming the meeting in my next communication on this unfolding UN initiative on UFOs/extraterrestrial life.

What follows next is a report of a further meeting between Clay and Shawn Pickering and their confidential source (A) regarding the UN meeting on UFOs held on the morning of February 12, 2008. They pointed out that the "unambiguous showing up" of extraterrestrial life - sitting over major cities - would occur in 2017, rather than 2013 as described in the earlier article. The role of religion and population growth was also allegedly discussed, and appeared to raise many issues at the meeting, especially for India.

A significant descriptive term chosen by source A for the extraterrestrials that would show up in 2017 was "The Controllers." Such a term has clear psychological connotations and was chosen to have a particular effect on the target audience - both UN member states in attendance and the general public to which the information was being leaked. This is a clue that source A is conveying information that has been designed to trigger a certain psychological reaction that influences how issues are framed and discussed.

Another aspect of the following report is that it was claimed that India would have a difficult time processing disclosure of extraterrestrial life, possibly leading to the elimination of Hinduism. This appears inconsistent with India's long tradition of advanced technologies and extraterrestrial life in its Vedic texts, and multiplicity of gods. If, as the confidential source claims, that Roman Catholics will have an easier time with disclosure due to the belief of "three Gods in one", so too might a religion like Hinduism which has a multiplicity of gods and is very eclectic.

I believe that the mention of India as a country that might experience disclosure problems is likely a fabrication intended to confuse disclosure related issues. When combined with the use of the descriptive term for extraterrestrials, "The Controllers" designed to trigger a particular psychological reaction and lead discussions in a certain direction, the possibility that the information is being relayed through an intelligence agency with expertise in psychological operations cannot be discounted. In the earlier message (February 13), Clay's and Shawn's confidential source (A) referred to an Admiral who was the ultimate authority for disclosure of the UN meeting to UFO/exopolitical community. Is this evidence that the Office of Naval Investigations is involved in the UFO disclosure initiative at the UN, or at least filtering information to be released to the UN and general public?

Most interesting for me was contrasting the agenda of the meeting revealed by Clay's and Shawn's confidential source (A) , and what I had been told by my independent source (B) who confirmed the UN meeting had occurred. Source B focused on issues concerning the release of restricted technologies for new energy sources and a document for feedback, while source A focused on population growth and religion. Curiously, source A did not mention any document being circulated to UN member states for feedback.

In conclusion, I am now satisfied that a meeting took place at the UN headquarters in New York of February 12 to discuss the issue of UFOs and extraterrestrial. What transpired at the meeting itself appears to differ according to the confidential source (A) Clay and Shawn have cited, and the independent source (B) used to confirm the meeting. The emergence of the alleged document circulated at the meeting and relayed to key ministries of other nations will help considerably in clarifying what was discussed and the accuracy of these respective sources. The possible role of the Office of Naval Intelligence in filtering information that is being related through source A is something that cannot be discounted when considering what was specifically discussed at the UN meeting. I look forward to reviewing any documents circulated at the meeting to get a better idea of the agenda issues discussed involving the role the UN would play in public disclosure of extraterrestrial life.

Aloha,

Michael E. Salla, Ph.D
Kona, Hawaii
2/20/08
www.Exopolitics.Org

----- Original Message ----
From: Shawn and Clay < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it >
To: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:21:17 AM
Subject: Follow up of source's UFO meeting at the UN

Dear Michael,

This email is a follow up of the UN meeting which took place Tuesday 12, 2008 at 8;00AM.
We met our source 7:00PM, Monday, February 18, 2008. Our source stated the following:

1) The meeting went well; however, our source left with a degree of frustration.

2) The meeting covered various topics. The issue of recent UFO sightings was one of many
topics discussed.

3) Security around the meeting was intense.

4) Everyone was searched. Pens, pins, key chain items were collected and not allowed
in the meeting room. There were multiple security checkpoints. UN security cards
were confiscated upon entering the room.

5) 50 to 60 people attended. Everyone was in civilian dress, except one Russian.

6) Other countries may have had military there, but they came under their respective civilian
titles.

7) UFO topic was addressed. The Russians are very paranoid about the west. Putin
is not very trusting. This frustrated our source greatly. Our source believes the
Russians will eventually come around; "They always come back to the table."
This mistrust appears to be an ongoing issue between East & West.

8) The religious implications of contact came up during the meeting. It turned into a
20 minute debate. Our source had to reel it in and refocus the meeting. It seems that
the Indians are very difficult to deal with on this issue of the religious implications
regarding contact. Population is a major factor in how nation-states deal with a new
paradigm. The Indian's world view has led to an unsustainable food, energy and water
demand. Source stated that the world must gets its population and resource use
under control. ET will help, but we must show them that we intend to live within our
constraints. If we don't show some semblance of intent, they simply will not help.

9) Source said the 2013 date of official contact is wrong. That is the date when things heat
up. The real date of contact is 2017. It is on this date when very large craft will appear
above cities and sit. There will be NO use of force; they will just sit there. Source
stated the "Independence Day" film was close, but their ships are not that big and,
again, no use of force will occur. Our source cannot reveal his source for the 2017
date. His source is very high up in the government/military/intelligence structure.

10) Source stated that it is our choice how we embrace this contact.

11) The ET's who will arrive on 2017 are referred to as "The Controllers." They are a
"galactic federation" type group; however, "galactic federation" is not the real
name for their group--it is hypothetical name used as a reference.

12) The controllers have a keen sense of freedom and free will. They will not intervene
and help humanity if humanity does not show them we want their help. If some
entropic event happens (nuclear war), the controllers will not make contact. "This
is something they will not tolerate," our source stated.

13) The controllers will not give us technology to expand our ability to feed ourselves
if we do not recognize the necessity to stabilize our population growth. They don't
want our planet's population to double because of a technological innovation seeded
by them. Our source used India as an example, " India has over 1 billion people. It
is clearly a country out of balance in terms of its population size."

14) A contentious moment in the meeting had to do with the religious implications of
contact. It is this issue which is of most concern. Our source stated that the more
secular societies will adjust more easily to contact than the fundamentalist. He stated,
" The Roman Catholic countries will not have a rough time, except for the population
problem; the Roman Catholics already have three Gods in one, so accepting others
is not that much of a stretch. The dividing point is going to be the containment of
population. The Protestant countries will deal fairly easily with contact. So will
countries with indigenous religions connected to nature. The Muslim, Hindu, and
fundamentalist Christian religions will have the most difficult time, possibly even the
elimination of said religions; we can expect mass suicides, social unrest and
upheaval. The ETs will help with re-programming and the concept of an inclusive
galactic order. However, society will have to step up to the plate to assist - one on
one - those people who have shattered belief systems The Chinese will have no
problem because of the Buddhist and Taoist influences."


Clay and Shawn Pickering

Email (will not be published)

Name

Title

Comment
 remaining characters

Post