What was discovered was an old patent
filed almost 20 years ago on November 9, 1987 showing that such a drone
was in the works. The patent was consequently issued on April 4, 1989.
The background given for this invention is as follows.
Patent title: MONITORING SYSTEM FOR POWER LINES AND RIGHT-OF-WAY USING REMOTELY PILOTED DRONE
Inventor: Mr. Roosevelt A. Fernandes, Liverpool, New York
Description of Invention:
The present invention relates to a
system and method of monitoring physical features of high voltage
electrical conductors and/or environmental features along the power
corridor through which the conductors extend. More specifically, the
invention relates to a power line monitoring system and method
utilizing a Remotely Piloted Drone (hereafter "RPD") which is flown
along the power corridor and carries one or more pieces of equipment
which provide observance and/or measurement of conductor and/or
environmental features.
In
the transmission of electrical power, high voltage conductors are
supported on a succession of towers along a power corridor, often
extending through geographically remote areas. It is necessary to
inspect on a regular basis the physical condition of both the power
lines and the corridor through which they extend. For example, the
following features are normally monitored at periodic intervals: the
condition of the conductor (pitting, fraying, etc.); identification of
poor splices; inspection of cracked insulators; location of critical,
thermally limiting transmission line segments; tower condition;
identification of gas emissions; storm damage inspection; inspection of
tree growth; and other right-of-way obstacles.
Right-of-way
1. The right to pass over property owned by another party.
2. The path or thoroughfare on which such passage is made.
3. The strip of land over which facilities such as highways, railroads, or power lines are built.
Note that the acronym RPD (Remotely Piloted Drone) is currently termed an RPV (Remotely Piloted Vehicle).
Within this patent are 27 patent claims
and a description at the RPD’s conception. Those can be found at the
source address below. However, keep in mind while reading that 20 years
is a very long time when it comes to advances in such technology so you
have to consider that such a patent would have gone through many
new-generations over those 20 years. Not only would this patent have
gone through many new-generations but over 20 years this patent has
probably even changed hands and by now could have very well been
acquired by a facet of the United States Government.
Because our reliance on energy is so
great, our vulnerability to an interruption in its supply is also
great. Included among U.S. energy systems are extensive networks of
electric generating facilities and transmission lines, natural gas
pipelines, oil refineries and pipelines, coal mines, repeater stations
and transport. The present method of monitoring thousands of miles of
any energy system is inadequate. Surveillance technologies developed
for defense and intelligence agencies may be useful in defending
against terrorist attacks, as well as against simple right-of-way
encroachments.
Today, disrupted systems due to
terrorism are sitting at the forefront at Homeland Security and it is
no secret that Homeland Security has been requesting drones since their
conception since this information is all over the Internet.
Consequently, such drones will be common place in the very near future
if they aren’t already.
We found Mr. Smith's sighting to be
authentic based on his frustration once accused of photoshopping the
photo (digital manipulation). To read his most recent email I could
tell that he didn't have a clue as to what photoshopping was and
instead was up in arms and decided to give up on the UFO community
since it appears to have let him down. Mr. Smith’s photo actually gave
us more insight since without it, we would not have had seen the
multiple power line occurrences. It was only when we saw Mr. Smith’s
photo did we begin to look in a different direction.
Since Mr. Fernandes’ drone was designed
to fly along power corridors, we find it very coincidental that many of
our photos presented were taken at proximity to power lines. In regard
to the drone witnessed in the Sequoia National Forest, Chad’s drone and
Rajman’s drone, these appear to be one of the same.
Chad’s drone was never pictured near
power lines however Rajman’s drone is that of Chad’s drone, which was
shot in very close proximity to the power lines. And, certainly power
lines traverse a forest as numerous as those in the desert. It would be
nice to know if both Chad and the woman from Lake Tahoe know whether or
not their sightings were anywhere near power lines.
In regard to the sighting explained by
Shirley P., we find it too coincidental that the 'unusual craft' is
doing pretty much what the Sequoia National Park Forest Service
employee stated, which was, "I'm told it's some kind of a
communications device that's supposed to help the park service monitor
the area for potential problems-stuff like fires and such." Not to
mention that the forest service employee has obviously seen it around
previous to his conversation with Shirley but yet the forest service
claims that they are not privy to such a drone. At that point, this
just tells us that somebody has a secret and they do not want people to
know what they are or who they belong to.
A UFO Casebook forum member contacted
the State of California Park Forestry Service and asked them if they
were familiar with such a drone. As well, he supplied a photo of the
unusual craft in question. Here was their very short response.
“There are no science or research
projects at Sequoia National Park involving craft like these, and no
one I spoke with has any knowledge of it.”
Thank you for your interest in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.
The Staff of Interpretation and Cultural Resources
Everyone is expecting to find an image
on the Internet of the unusual craft outside of the ones that have been
posted over the past 23 days. Research and development of such drones
would be managed through the Department of Defense and the Department
of Energy as well as coordinated by the industry groups mentioned
previously. Our government would never have posted such an image on the
Internet due to its nature. I can think of many reasons why they
wouldn't but I can't think of one reason why they would. Besides that,
bots and crawlers from search engines cannot access those types of
websites and access images so no images would have ever been found,
which we believe is why nobody can find any.
Our government was once very secretive
about our drone capabilities; however they have more recently decided
to make our UAV's public instead, and for good reason. The psychology
there is probably that the opposition thinks twice before planning any
type of attack, well knowing our capabilities however this RPV does not
fall into that category or way of thinking. Quite the contrary since
they would not want anyone to be too awful privy of its existence since
it’s application would be used on our soil or in our airspace.
What do we make of the sound and what is the drone's power source?
In regard to what the craft sounded
like, there were two reports available. This is a compilation of Chad
and Lake Tahoe’s claim. “Sometimes there is a very slight hum that
sounds kind of mechanical, almost like when you are near very large
power lines. But it is nothing loud like a jet engine; it is very quiet
for the most part. Like I said, it sounds like power lines if you get
close enough to it.” “It didn't make any noise except for a very, very
faint sound that is hard to describe but sounded like something
vibrating. We both heard the sound although just barely.”
As you will find when you read on, we
believe that what the witnesses heard were the power lines themselves
and the sound the actual drone was making as it was recharging itself,
for lack of a better word.
In regard to the energy used to power
this drone, we discovered another patent filed on February 6, 2004,
regarding devices such as those mounted to a drone, which are coupled
to high voltage transmission lines where they obtain power themselves
directly from the line and to be used to power the drone. A common
component of all these devices relates to the power supply energy
source means for generating the comparatively lower voltage required
for operation of the device. The following is a description of this
patent and the source information follows this article.
Patent title: BODY CAPACITANCE ELECTRIC FIELD POWERED DEVICE FOR HIGH VOLTAGE LINES
Inventors: Gunn, Colin N., Lightbody, Simon H. Forth, J. Bradford Hancock, Martin A. and Hyatt, Geoffrey T.
Description of Invention:
Devices that couple to high voltage
transmission lines obtain power themselves using the body capacitance
of an element of the devices. The devices generate a comparatively
lower voltage from the current flowing between the high voltage line
and the element of the device that generates the body capacitance. The
devices can be used to operate sensors that monitor the transmission
lines or parameters of the power distribution system, such as current,
line temperature, vibration, and the like.
The
devices can also be used as indicators, such as aircraft warning
lights, information signs, etc. In addition, the devices can operate as
RF transmission/reception or repeater devices, radar devices, mesh
networking nodes, video/audio surveillance, sound emitting devices for
scaring animals, drones that traverse the power line, etc. Because the
devices operate in response to line voltage rather than current, the
devices are reliable even in low current conditions.
Please understand that neither of the
patents above necessarily belong to the drones in question. These are
simply the best examples that we could find, which explain what a power
line monitoring drone would look like and it's function.
Recently, a member of the UFO Casebook
forum mentioned that the body of the drone appeared to be made from
ceramic. Ceramics are used for both capacitors and insulators on power
lines. Since a capacitor's function is to store electricity, or
electrical energy, then the circular part of this drone (the body)
would be the storage area for the electrical energy.
What about the other parts of the craft?
Much of this is assumption so everyone is welcome to give us your own input.
Figure A questionable
Figure B possibly a stabilizer or balance used to offset the weight of C, D and E.
Figures C, D and E possibly keeps the
drone from becoming entangled in the power lines as the drone moves up
along the power line itself.
Why does the craft seemingly have an unusual text on its underside?
We simply believe that they do not want
people to know who the drone belongs to. Imagine a terrorist taking a
picture of the underside of let's say Chad's drone. Then they take a
closer look at the text on their photo. Like us they would probably
start to wonder if it's an authentic alien craft instead because even
they can't figure out what language that is. Besides that, there is a
lot of psychology behind not knowing something. It leaves one guessing
instead of thinking about taking it down and destroying it.
What would we expect the government to
put on the craft, Property of the United States Government or the
Department of Defense or maybe the Department of Energy? Taking into
consideration the costs of such a drone, and the numbers of those who
have no respect for the American tax dollar and have a ‘shoot them out
of the sky’ mentality, I imagine they would have preferred to put
absolutely nothing on it but that would make one inquisitive and want
more answers.
Based on photographic evidence from
various areas of the United States; and the similarities exhibited in
the shape, dynamics and ability of this craft to stay airborne; and
with very little information that is currently available on the public
domain, we concur and are of the opinion that this machine is
operational as an remotely piloted drone vehicle (RPV) being used to
surveillance power line and right-of-way corridors; perhaps as part of
our homeland security operations or perhaps simply a maintenance
monitor drone for the power company.
Eileen Nesbitt, UFO Casebook Investigator
P. Smith, UFO Casebook Investigator