The
common criticism against the exopolitical agenda is that it claims to
"know all the answers". This is simply untrue and somewhat absurd. There is no way a structure dealing with such a phenomena can know all the answers
- instead exopolitics is trying to maybe fill the vacuum left by 50
years of UFO studies and the many other structures that have failed to adequately confront the issue - ie: to at least attempt to provide a map of the terrain as we explore our way collectively to a shared cosmos.
One
of the reasons the field exopolitics has demonstration huge growth in
the last few years and the reason why it will continue to embrace a
wide audience is because unlike the older UFO field it is a dynamic, organic process of becoming.
It's good that we have [currently] 3 main players in the exopolitical
field - and none of them fall into the traps the old UFO groups
did of constant back-biting and false binary opposition arguments. We have Steve Bassett with his approach, Salla with another and the main man Webre with yet one more.
Although Steve Bassett primarily centres his focus on political lobbying [see: PRG definition of exopol and disclosure - paradigmresearchgroup.org
] - he has no problems with wider fields of exploration. Webre on the
other hand has a vast range of knowledge and experience in a multitude
of areas and is a true, mulit-modal synthesiser - incorporating much of
it into his and Carol Rosin's "Four D's" [see: www.exopolitics.com]. Webre states that exopolitics is an interplay - not a static definition.
The
common criticism against the exopolitical agenda is that it claims to
"know all the answers". This is simply untrue and somewhat absurd. There is no way a structure dealing with an alien intelligence can know all the answers
- instead exopolitics is trying to maybe fill the vacuum left by 50
years of UFO studies - ie: to at least attempt to provide a map of the terrain as we explore our way collectively to the cosmos and ETI.
The "politics" of exopolitics has a small p.
It in no way deals with *just* the formal political structures.
Disclosure has a far wider definition - especially in this era of
networked hyper media and the failing mainstream media outlets. The
1960s model of activism is now but one option on the agenda and
exopolitical thought should, and does, encompass them all.
On many levels the systems of the Catholic model of mediated priesthood vs. direct connection to the "Other" are being played out. Endless excursions into politics with a large "P" or 'insider'/intel
circular "disclosure" leaks are now only part of the game. Disclosure
by its nature is chaotic, prankster-like and mostly unpredictable. One
only has to look at the recent, voluminous footage from Mexico to know
that to an extent "we" are not in control and our agendas may well be
irrelevant to the wider scheme of things.
» No Comments
There are no comments on this Exopolitics UK article at this moment.
» Post Comment Exopolitics UK site guests need to enter the anti-spam code.
