!-UPDATED-! Are we part of a wider conflict for resources on the planet?
This could be physical resources or it could be more of a cultural
dominance - a struggle for uber-consciousness? ET-ET struggles? ET-Human conflicts or a hazy mix of both?
In these out-takes, a couple
from David Sereda's latest DVD, the destruction of the Columbia space
shuttle is discussed. If we are on the right track with this incident,
does it, in the words of Webster Tarpley, give us a few seconds lens for which to view the secret government cabals at work?
S.F. man's astounding photo
Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated
Sabin Russell, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 5, 2003
Top investigators of the Columbia space shuttle disaster are analyzing a startling photograph -- snapped by an amateur astronomer from a San Francisco hillside -- that appears to show a purplish electrical bolt striking the craft as it streaked across the California sky.
The digital image is one of five snapped by the shuttle buff at roughly 5: 53 a.m. Saturday as sensors on the doomed orbiter began showing the first indications of trouble. Seven minutes later, the craft broke up in flames over Texas.
The photographer requested that his name not be used and said he would not release the image to the public until NASA experts had time to examine it.
Although there are several possible benign explanations for the image -- such as a barely perceptable jiggle of the camera as it took the time exposure -- NASA's zeal to examine the photo demonstrates the lengths at which the agency is going to tap the resources of ordinary Americans in solving the puzzle.
Late Tuesday, NASA dispatched former shuttle astronaut Tammy Jernigan, now a manager at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, to the San Francisco home of the astronomer to examine his digital images and to take the camera itself to Mountain View, where it was to be transported by a NASA T-38 jet to Houston this morning.
A Chronicle reporter was present when the astronaut arrived. First seeing the image on a large computer screen, she had one word: "Wow."
Videos: 3 Parts
Intro - The object glimpsed at the end is NOT part of the Shuttle debris
Part 1
Part 2
David Sereda and
others discuss the possibility that the planet is caught in a
terrestrial-ET space conflict or an ET-ET conflict.
Part of this
looks at the case of the Columbia Shuttle which was seen with two UFOs
and also photographed by a scientist who caught several frames showing
some kind of plasma weapon homing in on the shuttle body.
What are
the consequences of above-government agencies knowing about these type
of conflicts and failing to disclose it to the world?
What sticks out in my mind related to this is of course the two shuttle incidents that are still not fully explained but without doubt have ET either/and/or covert ops angles to them.
First
we have the infamous tether episode where some sort of energy field in
the vacuum of the upper atmosphere/orbit was being 'played' with - and ultimately, after being surrounded by numerous UFOs, the multi-million dollar tether "broke". Check out the video on that page with Trevor J. Constable [early pioneer of Reichian based techniques using forms of orgone to attract UFOs... stolen of course by various entities from the intel communities] See: tether-footage-and-collective-nasa--denial
...and the fact some sort of plasma or pulse energy weapon was possibly used to destroy Columbia on re-entry.
Was this due to the black technology that it was carrying? See this BBC article - pretty revealing stuff.
But this is of course the tip of the proverbial 'berg when ultra secret sections of alphabet agencies are discussing use of advanced energy gadgets vis-a-vis STS missions:
Image from R. Collins - 'Exempt From Disclosure' - Located by OM
Here the document describes the devices as 'Extra-terrestrial':
Image from R. Collins - 'Exempt From Disclosure' - Located by OM
- ET groups
or
- Competing sectors of the M.I.E.C. ??
...which has resulted in the two examples above?
What's
worth keeping in mind is the fact that we think the Shuttle missions
are all about nice little science tests with educational link-ups to
schools across the globe or we're constantly told how the missions are
a kind of glorified space garage... performing routine repairs on the
space station or 'faulty' satellites. Instead if you check the amount
of "military" vs civillian type funding you know there is far more
going on that's kept under wraps - just as NASA has made an art of
doing.
Quote: ""We continue to investigate the foam as a possible root cause," Mr Dittemore said."
- Yup OK NASA. Foam can cause such a devastating event
- here's the crash area of the Columbia's fragmented shell:
Plus
it isn't just NASA - everyone's got their fingers in the ExoPolitical
space pie. Rumsfeld and Cheney were core players in the Pentagon's use
of the Clementine mission moon imaging orgy and as usual, the "quieter"
agencies are the one's doing most the action:
The Department of Defense (DOD)
has a less visible but equally substantial space program. Tracking the
DOD space budget is extremely difficult since space is not identified
as a separate line item in the budget. DOD sometimes releases only
partial information (omitting funding for classified programs) or will
suddenly release without explanation new figures for prior years that
are quite different from what was previously reported.
Top secret device:
Quote:
Reuters
news agency reported that around the town of Bronson, near the
Texas-Louisiana border, hundreds of national guardsmen joined federal
agents and volunteers to search for what was believed to be a
top-secret device from the shuttle.
People involved in the
search said they were given written instructions on what the device
looked like as well as a picture of a plate attached to it which read
"Secret Government Property".
So
we know Columbia was carrying black tech - since the incident US crash
retrieval top brass have made sure you know you're off to jail for even
thinking about grabbing a memento. Later they try the desperate amnesty
route!
I think it's not an unfair conclusion to assume that some covert experiments done by STS missions have broken long standing agreements made with some sort of ET confederation and thus in response the PRIME DIRECTIVE of non-intervention in the [monkey] bizniz of a developing planet was *also* broken and the Shuttle zapped as a token kind of example.
Links here are for a couple of articles - one by UK author Tim Good who discusses the possibilities of an ET/terran conflict and the other by Dr M. Salla provides a useful editorial type discussion of the STS mission we've covered here.
10"foo-fighting" at Saturday, 23 August 2008 14:38by davID
"Just wanted to put forth the possibility of a spark from a similar device. (Although I heard the report of seeing two saucers being seen shortly after the event)."
- hi, I see where you are going with that line of thought but the so-called foo fighters seem to me to have been different technology to the "orbs" we see chasing planes and the shuttle. - If the Nazi "fireballs" existed in WWII - they were more a device to shut off allied plane engines [as seen in current UFO encounters with cars etc] whereas the more recent orbs seem to be more of a reconnaissance device used by ETs and/or black-project military.
9"I doubt it." at Saturday, 23 August 2008 14:28by Who Knows
While were speculating on so many levels, I've noticed that the little baseballs (Foo fighters) tend to watch things like presidential planes and shuttles. Just wanted to put forth the possibility of a spark from a similar device. (Although I heard the report of seeing two saucers being seen shortly after the event).
8"Embargo'd earth" at Monday, 11 August 2008 17:57by davID
Hi Rich "Earth orbit would be a far safer place to test a revolutionary energy-producing device than a ground-based lab. "
--> Maybe but when does an 'advanced' energy system' being tested become a weapon?? Although earth orbit is already weaponised with satellite/observation/tracking systems which LOOK OUTWARDS into space instead of towards earth as stipulated, we are no doubt under some kind of embargo for testing of advanced weapons systems and disregarding this may well have brought retaliation from either/and/or ET groups or *terrestrial* covert black tech factions.
davID -
7"ED/STS accident" at Monday, 11 August 2008 18:33by Rich
A posited 'ET conflict' is not the only possible explanation here. Neither is the involvement of ETV's or an alleged covert war or secret treaties.
Assuming that some kind of novel energy device was being tested on STS 107, then a reasonable explanation is that the device malfunctioned or somehow interfered with the shuttle's avionics systems, causing the accident.
Earth orbit would be a far safer place to test a revolutionary energy-producing device than a ground-based lab.
6Comment at Saturday, 28 June 2008 02:41by T.Binter
The foam hit theory was laughable either way
5"Comment below" at Monday, 23 June 2008 20:12by davID - Exopolitics UK
- Those documents are supposedly not authentic I have since found out BUT Robert Collins [see book] claims the data they are based on is real. This type of thing happens a lot. Instead of criticising - why don't you come back with some research and post it here. I'll happily add an article linked to this item if you do one. davID, Exo UK
4Comment at Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:46by Tim
Do you think if "Top Secret" papers about a recovery mission of extraterestrial space craft was made public, someone would have heard about it. ED may ass! Get some real evidence!
3"Mom?" at Monday, 05 May 2008 04:26by Mark Bingham
Why would a UFO not get rid of the evidence by taking the shuttle wreckage and dumping it on the back ass-side of the moon?
Makes no sense.
2"shuttle use cont..." at Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:46by davID
2. I would not be shocked if we had broken some agreement by taking black tech that may or may not have ET origin and thus the shuttle got destroyed as a lesson.
seems harsh but then these are high stake days my friends.
1"Shuttle use" at Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:45by davID
It seems the Shuttle is virtually a relic used for basic and diversionary missions. This may seem silly to most people until you read Ricgard Hoagland's book "Dark Mission" about how former NAZIs were placed in core positions at NASA. Along with their placement came NASA's now well discussed use of occult days for launches and missions.
» Post Comment Exopolitics UK site guests need to enter the anti-spam code.
-
