!-UPDATED-! Are we part of a wider conflict for resources on the planet? This could be physical resources or it could be more of a cultural dominance - a struggle for uber-consciousness? ET-ET struggles? ET-Human conflicts or a hazy mix of both? In these out-takes, a couple from David Sereda's latest DVD, the destruction of the Columbia space shuttle is discussed. If we are on the right track with this incident, does it, in the words of Webster Tarpley, give us a few seconds lens for which to view the secret government cabals at work? Taken from Playlist: http://uk.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=104AB177A130EC33

Sabin Russell, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, February 5, 2003

Top investigators of the Columbia space shuttle disaster are analyzing a startling photograph -- snapped by an amateur astronomer from a San Francisco hillside -- that appears to show a purplish electrical bolt striking the craft as it streaked across the California sky.

The digital image is one of five snapped by the shuttle buff at roughly 5: 53 a.m. Saturday as sensors on the doomed orbiter began showing the first indications of trouble. Seven minutes later, the craft broke up in flames over Texas.

The photographer requested that his name not be used and said he would not release the image to the public until NASA experts had time to examine it.

Although there are several possible benign explanations for the image -- such as a barely perceptable jiggle of the camera as it took the time exposure -- NASA's zeal to examine the photo demonstrates the lengths at which the agency is going to tap the resources of ordinary Americans in solving the puzzle.

Late Tuesday, NASA dispatched former shuttle astronaut Tammy Jernigan, now a manager at Lawrence Livermore Laboratories, to the San Francisco home of the astronomer to examine his digital images and to take the camera itself to Mountain View, where it was to be transported by a NASA T-38 jet to Houston this morning.

A Chronicle reporter was present when the astronaut arrived. First seeing the image on a large computer screen, she had one word: "Wow."

Videos: 3 Parts 

Intro - The object glimpsed at the end is NOT part of the Shuttle debris

Part 1
 

Part 2 

David Sereda and others discuss the possibility that the planet is caught in a terrestrial-ET space conflict or an ET-ET conflict.

Part of this looks at the case of the Columbia Shuttle which was seen with two UFOs and also photographed by a scientist who caught several frames showing some kind of plasma weapon homing in on the shuttle body.

What are the consequences of above-government agencies knowing about these type of conflicts and failing to disclose it to the world?

What sticks out in my mind related to this is of course the two shuttle incidents that are still not fully explained but without doubt have ET either/and/or covert ops angles to them.

First we have the infamous tether episode where some sort of energy field in the vacuum of the upper atmosphere/orbit was being 'played' with -  and ultimately, after being surrounded by numerous UFOs, the multi-million dollar tether "broke". Check out the video  on that page with Trevor J. Constable [early pioneer of Reichian based techniques using forms of orgone to attract UFOs... stolen of course by various entities from the intel communities] See: tether-footage-and-collective-nasa--denial

...and the fact some sort of plasma or pulse energy weapon was possibly used to destroy Columbia on re-entry.

But this is of course the tip of the proverbial 'berg when ultra secret sections of alphabet agencies are discussing use of advanced energy gadgets vis-a-vis STS missions:  

  Image from R. Collins - 'Exempt From Disclosure' - Located by OM
 

Here the document describes the devices as 'Extra-terrestrial':

  Image from R. Collins - 'Exempt From Disclosure' - Located by OM

 
And does the use of ED and other similar black tech mean that "we" are seriously pissing-off either:

- ET groups
or
- Competing sectors of the M.I.E.C. ??

...which has resulted in the two examples above?

What's worth keeping in mind is the fact that we think the Shuttle missions are all about nice little science tests with educational link-ups to schools across the globe or we're constantly told how the missions are a kind of glorified space garage... performing routine repairs on the space station or 'faulty' satellites. Instead if you check the amount of "military" vs civillian type funding you know there is far more going on that's kept under wraps - just as NASA has made an art of doing.

Quote: ""We continue to investigate the foam as a possible root cause," Mr Dittemore said."

- Yup OK NASA. Foam can cause such a devastating event - here's the crash area of the Columbia's fragmented shell: 

 
Plus it isn't just NASA - everyone's got their fingers in the ExoPolitical space pie. Rumsfeld and Cheney were core players in the Pentagon's use of the Clementine mission moon imaging orgy and as usual, the "quieter" agencies are the one's doing most the action:

The Department of Defense (DOD) has a less visible but equally substantial space program. Tracking the DOD space budget is extremely difficult since space is not identified as a separate line item in the budget. DOD sometimes releases only partial information (omitting funding for classified programs) or will suddenly release without explanation new figures for prior years that are quite different from what was previously reported. 

Top secret device:

Quote:

http://www.exopolitics.org.uk/misc/misc-items/timothy-good-on-et%11earth-conflict/ 

http://www.exopolitics.org.uk/research-papers/2007/shuttle-columbia-was-destroyed-by-a-plasma-beam/